
Peter McPherson
President
NASULGC, A Public University Association
Higher
Education in Africa:
Making a Link
Between
Intellectual
Capital and
Regional
Development
May 6, 2008
10:00 AM
House Committee on Foreign Affairs
Subcommittee
on Africa and Global Health
Introduction:
Mr. Chairman, and distinguished Members of the Committee, thank you for inviting me to speak to you about “Higher Education in Africa: Making a Link Between Intellectual Capital and Regional Development.”
As Administrator of USAID in the 1980s, I was engaged in these issues and as President of Michigan State University, an institution with a rich history of development work in Africa, I continued my interest and concern about African development. Now as president of NASULGC, an association of the largest U.S. public universities with a long and distinguished history of development work in Africa, I am deeply engaged in discussions concerning the role of higher education in development in Africa with growing concern about the declining role of higher education in the U.S. government development portfolio.
Mr. Chairman I want to thank you personally for your support and focus on a number of issues regarding Africa’s future from food aid, to agricultural development and now higher education. These are all intimately connected. My testimony today emphasizes the importance of higher education to African development.
Before I address the questions on which you asked me to comment, I want to share with you a very exciting development directly related to the issue we are discussing. Last week, on April 30, the U.S. Agency for International Development announced that it will collaborate with the National Association of State Universities and Land-Grant Colleges (NASULGC) to build African university capacity for instruction and problem solving through the Africa-U.S. Higher Education Initiative.
The Africa-U.S. Higher Education Initiative is led by NASULGC with the Partnership to Cut Hunger and Poverty in Africa, the Forum for Agricultural Research in Africa (FARA), Higher Education for Development (HED), and the American Distance Education Consortium (ADEC) as key partners. The goal of the Initiative is to strengthen African higher education capacity in science and technology for development in partnership with U.S. institutions of higher education.
USAID announced the $1 million grant during the two-day Higher Education Summit for Global Development at the U.S. State Department which drew 200 university presidents, government officials, and corporate and foundation leaders to Washington from around the globe. The USAID grant will fund 20 partnership planning grants of $50,000 to plan long-term collaborations between African and U.S. institutions focused on building capacity for instruction and problem solving in the areas of agriculture, health care, science and technology, primary and secondary education, business and other disciplines. The funds will go to the American Council on Education (ACE) with NASULGC and Higher Education for Development (HED) providing leadership for implementation of the grant. The entire $1 million will be used for partnership grants because NASULGC and others will bear the administrative costs.
The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation also awarded a $100,000 grant to NASULGC to build the grant-making framework for the Africa-U.S. Higher Education Initiative.
In the future, the Initiative will seek substantial additional funding for long-term university partnerships focused on enhancing instruction and problem solving capacity in African universities. The Initiative has identified six priority fields of study upon which to focus capacity development efforts: agriculture, environment and natural resources; engineering; science and technology; health; education and teacher training; and business, management, and economics. Seven capacity building priorities have been identified within these academic fields in discussion with African universities: faculty development; curriculum and teaching; institutional leadership and management, marketing, advocacy and fundraising; research, technology and problem solving; financial diversification and resource mobilization; improvement of teaching and research facilities and equipment; and development of linkages with private, public and NGO institutions globally, regionally and locally.
While these are very promising developments, the needs in Africa for higher education capacity are substantial. It will take a concerted effort of the donor community including the World Bank, foundations and our partners in other counties working hand-in-hand with Africans to make meaningful progress. Congress also clearly has a role to play. We believe the development of African higher education is in the U.S. national interest and should be a policy priority for the region. Toward that end, Mr. Chairman, we urge you to consider legislation authorizing a program to provide long-term assistance to support and promote higher education in Africa, much as we have done on basic education.
Key points of the testimony:
¨
significant
lack, in both quantity and quality, of faculty training capacity;
¨
lack of
capacity to train leaders in governance and management of higher education
institutions to meet the new challenges;
¨
problems of quality
and relevance in curriculum;
¨
lack of
capacity for financial diversification;
¨
weak research
and innovation capacities;
¨
poor physical
facilities and infrastructure;
¨ uneven access along gender, ethnicity and geographic lines;
Testimony
I.
What benefits to the continent could U.S. support for the expansion and
improvement of colleges and universities bring?
With
growing interdependence, it is critical that countries have the institutional
capacity to interact globally to solve problems and create opportunities for
development, security, peace and justice.
Economies and societies are now linked as never before and the ability
to improve people’s lives rests substantially on the development of human
skills and the capacity to develop and adapt technology appropriate to the
needs of individual nations and local situations. Broad-based development and transformation in Africa requires
significant human and institutional capacity development. Higher education institutions are vital to
this process of developing and nurturing the human capacity, research
capability and outreach programs required for equitable and sustainable growth
and transformation.
“Higher
education produces the entrepreneurs, the creative thinkers, the business
leaders that generate economic growth and turn poor countries into prosperous
ones. Tertiary education exercises a direct influence on national productivity
which largely determines living standards and a country’s ability to compete in
the globalization process.”[1]
The developing world and Africa particularly are facing a food crisis. Global demand for food, especially cereals, has sharply increased while supply has plateaued. In the short-term, we can potentially increase yields of food supplies by applying existing, and developing new technologies and practices to keep pace with the present and short-term projected global demand increases. But we need to think beyond the short term as well. In the longer term, by linking research and technology development with human and institutional capacity building – primarily the products of higher education – we can create the in-country capacity to solve future agriculture problems and foster national development. Properly executed this effort will grow economies, reduce rural and urban poverty, lower food prices, increase food supplies and provide better nutrition for child cognitive and physical development. Overall this process will stabilize societies, create allies for the U.S. and increase our national security.
Investing in higher education in developing countries is a
critical component to long-term economic growth, stability, and poverty
reduction. Investments in higher
education promote technological “catch-up” and “leap-frogging,” allowing
countries to gain ground on more technologically advanced societies and
maximize economic output. To illustrate
the economic growth potential of higher education on GDP, a one-year increase
in tertiary education stock would raise steady-state levels of African GDP per
capita by 12.2 percent due to factor inputs, potentially boosting incomes by 3
percent after five years, a significant feat considering the trend towards
decreasing incomes in some African countries.[2]
Many
African countries do not have the human resources, research capabilities and
infrastructure targeted to adapt or develop the technology required for
broad-based economic development. Higher education institutions are key to this
process of developing and nurturing the human skills, research capability and
outreach programs required to effectively utilize S&T for African
development. Demand for higher education
is growing at astounding rates, stretching even further the already strained
capacity of higher education institutions. Higher education enrollment in Africa has, in
fact, been doubling every five years, the fastest rate of increase in the
world.[3] In order to be more effective, African higher
education must adapt to the new environment of educational needs that is
emerging in Sub-Saharan Africa. The
challenges African higher education institutions face, discussed below, are
many and require serious commitment and attention on the part of both African
governments and international donors.
In
sum:
II. How would you describe the state of higher
education in sub-Saharan Africa and what are the major challenges facing
African colleges and universities in terms of curriculum development, faculty
and student recruitment and retention or other areas?
A
group concerned with international development generally, and Africa
specifically, which includes NASUGLC, the Partnership to Cut Hunger in Africa
and others have gathered information about the challenges and possible
opportunities facing African higher education through research and
consultations with African leaders in higher education, U.S. colleagues and
Congressional contacts, and other experts.
The
major challenges of higher education in Africa stem from three principle
factors:
1.
Demand for higher
education has been increasing at extraordinarily rapid rates.
2.
Little investment
has been made in African higher education for two decades now.
3.
The structures of
African institutions of higher education have not adapted sufficiently to
changing contexts and labor force needs.
Exploding demand
In
Africa, the demand for higher education has been increasing extraordinarily
rapidly. Higher education enrollment in
Africa has, in fact, been doubling every five years,[4] the fastest rate of increase in the world.[5] This is due to a fast-growing 18-year-old
population cohort and an increasing proportion of that cohort achieving
secondary level diplomas. In addition, economic
growth in many African countries has also contributed to a growing demand for
post-secondary education as more can now afford at least some level of higher
education. Among the unresolved challenges is the need
to expand tertiary education coverage in a sustainable and equitable way, creating
opportunities for historically disadvantaged populations.[6] (In spite of rapid enrollment growth in the
higher education sector, Africa’s higher education gross enrollment ratio (GER)
- participation of the 18-23 years age-cohort - remains the lowest in the world
around 5%, trailing South Asia (10%), East Asia (19%), and North Africa and
Middle East (23%), another clear sign of the need to address this crisis.)
Lack of funding
Over the last two decades external
development assistance to higher education has declined significantly as donors
have focused overwhelmingly on funding primary and secondary education. This drop
began in the early 1980s when the World Bank published a series of papers that
argued that returns to primary and secondary education were much greater.[7] In addition, priorities shifted toward an
emphasis on the delivery of goods and services, not long-term training. This donor perspective has shaped most of the
sub-Saharan national Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers that influence not only
donor investment but national budgetary allocations as well. Furthermore, it
has been difficult for most African countries to commit significant public
investment to higher education due to other immediate problems and crises that
require immediate attention and resources.
Although we know that education correlates with mortality rates, there
are always more immediate and obvious causes of mortality and suffering that
are perceived to demand greater urgency.
The imbalance in funding between
higher education and basic education must be addressed. Indeed,
the quality of primary and secondary education in Africa suffers from the lack
of capacity of African higher education institutions to produce high quality
teachers, education leaders, supervisors and curriculum specialists. The impact of higher education extends well
beyond primary and secondary teaching capacity, however. Broad-based
development in Africa cannot happen without well-educated African leaders, a
strong human resource base, and institutions that can produce the knowledge
necessary to address critical local, national and regional problems and produce
significant economic growth that will ultimately sustain the education systems
without donor assistance.
Structural Issues
African
university systems were created in a colonial model that produced graduates intended
to serve in the public sector. In the
first years after independence, this need for public sector servants was even
greater. But over the years, the needs
of African countries have changed radically. Yet, institutional structures have adapted little to these changes in
context. African leaders have expressed
strong concern about the need for their universities to develop entrepreneurs,
business leaders, scientists, and other professionals. Research, education and extension are housed
in separate institutions in many African countries which disconnects higher
education from innovation and problem solving activities. There is a desire for
closer links between African universities and national and international
public, private and civil society sectors to make sure that universities are
more relevant to the development of their societies.
These core problems underpin a variety of challenges that African
universities face including:
1. Critical
lack of capacity to address faculty shortages and quality concerns. Across Africa and across disciplines, on
average, only 70% of the required faculty are at post. In some university departments only 30 to 40%
of the total faculty requirements are currently met.[8] The situation is particularly serious with
respect to the shortage of senior faculty at the Ph.D. level. This shortage of
faculty and other staff is due to a combination of factors including the
inability to attract and retain qualified faculty due to low wages and poor
working conditions, the retirement of many faculty trained years ago when
investments were greater, loss of faculty to HIV/AIDS. Institutions also face shortages of technical,
administrative and management staff. The situation is crippling not only higher
education institutions but also affects the other levels of education services,
health care systems and overall economic activities. Africa must build its
capacity to provide these human resources.
2. Governance,
leadership and management. Poor
management and governance practices and structures plague many institutions and
further exacerbate the challenges faced by higher education in Africa.
Management inefficiencies drain scarce resources away from the fundamental
objectives of increasing access, quality and relevance of education and spread
resources even more thinly. Academic leaders are rarely trained in the
management of higher education institutions. Some areas where African
institutions need particular assistance is in strategic planning, market
research and advocacy, research management, financial planning and management,
human resource management and performance management.
3. Problems
of quality and relevance. Due
to extreme financial austerity over so many years, quality of teaching,
learning and research has declined. Universities now operate with overcrowded
and deteriorating physical facilities, limited and obsolete library resources,
insufficient equipment and instructional materials, outdated curricula, and teaching
staff that often lack extensive training themselves. Due to lack of investment,
universities also lack access to global knowledge networks and resources, which
leaves them isolated, making it even more difficult to “catch up.” There is also
widespread concern about the relevance of curricula and the overall mismatch
between programs of study and labor market requirements. Practical instruction
receives insufficient emphasis, and students have little opportunity to develop
technical competencies, problem solving experience or communication and
organizational skills.
4. Weak
research and innovation capacities. Higher education institutions in Africa do not yet possess adequate
research capabilities due both to a lack of funding (for investments in infrastructure,
facilities, and equipment) and the colonial legacy of these institutions. While funding is critical, the institutional
separation between education (in the universities) and the research in research
institutions is a fundamental constraint on faculty and curriculum development
and relevance of the higher education system to society. African universities,
on the whole, generally do not play the important development role that
universities play in the United States, generating and adapting new knowledge
and technology.[9] Research
skills are most commonly acquired during masters and doctoral training, but
Sub-Saharan African universities have minimal graduate output. Research has
often been neglected due to increased teaching workloads generated by enormous
undergraduate enrolment expansions. These
circumstances seriously constrain the building up of those elements of national
innovation systems that are so essential for increasing national productivity
including research capacity, university trained researchers and professionals,
graduates with advanced technical and managerial skills, and dynamic
university-industry linkages
5. Lack
of capacity for financial diversification. Around the world, institutions
of higher education must adapt to decreasing public funding and learn to
diversify their funding sources. Higher
education institutions in Sub Saharan Africa have limited experience, expertise
and capacity in managing these challenges of financial diversification and
resource mobilization.
6. Poor
physical facilities and infrastructure. Higher education institutions in Africa have seen little or no
infrastructure improvements in the last few decades, due to insufficient budgets
and overdependence on public financing as discussed above. Infrastructures and
equipment, such as the internet, libraries, classroom space, laboratories and textbooks
are critical bottlenecks resulting in the deterioration of quality of education
and learning. The poor state of facilities also affects the quality of research
and its ability to contribute to societal development and progress.
7. Uneven
access and low levels of enrollment in certain areas.
Despite the tidal wave of new students, graduate level (MSc and PhD)
student enrollments are still small. A great
concern is also in the low enrollment figures in sciences, engineering and
technology, and health fields, which are critically needed for innovation,
knowledge generation and adaptation and overall national competitiveness. Less
than 30% of students in higher education institutions in Sub-Saharan Africa are
enrolled in the fields of agriculture, health sciences, engineering and
technology and basic and applied sciences.
Another challenge in sub-Saharan Africa is a significant gender
imbalance in higher education. In 2004 of the 3.4 million total tertiary
education student enrollment the proportion of female students was only 38% and
the proportion of female teaching staff just 4%. In math, science and engineering,
female student enrollment is particularly low.
III.
What types of support could the United States give to African colleges and
universities in order to help them provide a greater number of students with
high quality education?
African
university systems were created in a colonial model that produced graduates intended
to serve in the public sector. While the needs of African countries have
changed radically, resources have not been available to make responsive changes
in the institutional structure and capacity. For African institutions to
make these changes, it will require both resources and partnership with higher
education institutions that have functioned in a mission-oriented environment,
responsive to needs in the public and private sectors. The establishment of partnerships
between American and African institutions of higher education is a tried and
tested mechanism that has previously fostered significant of institutional
capacity development in Africa decades ago when appropriately funded.
A
new kind of partnership is needed now, based on mutual respect and solidarity,
and rooted in a grounded analysis of what actually works. For Africa to end
poverty, requires a partnership between Africa and the developed world, which
takes full account of Africa’s diversity and particular circumstances and
allows for African leadership in the identification of needs and opportunities.
After consultations with leaders from Africa and the United States, it
is clear that partnerships among African and U.S. higher education institutions
focusing on science and technology are an expressed interest of both African
and U.S. institutions because of their perceived importance in economic,
political and social development. This interest extends to a broad continuum of
U.S. and African institutions including four-year institutions and community
and technical colleges, both public and private, serving a diverse set of
students.
African leadership’s interest in developing African capacity in science
and technology is capsulated in the Addis Ababa Declaration on Science and Technology and Scientific Research for
Development issued by the Heads of State of the African Union in January
2007. Prominent donor publications,
including the report of the National Research Council to USAID in 2006, titled
“The Fundamental Role of Science and Technology in International Development”[10] and others from the World Bank, the U.N.,
the Rand Corporation and other institutions, suggest that donors are aligning
behind African governments on this vision.
Partnerships
between African and U.S. higher education institutions have substantial
benefits for American institutions as well.
U.S. institutions need to incorporate international dimensions into
their education, discovery and engagement programs to increase their excellence
in this global world. This is especially
true for improving U.S. institutions’ understandings of Africa.
Africa
and the United States are becoming more interconnected through trade,
investment, security, health, and cultural policies and programs. African exports to the U.S. increased by 40%
and 23% in 2005 and 2006, respectively.
About 22% of Africa’s exports go to the United States. U.S. exports to Africa increased by 15% and
22% in 2005 and 2006, respectively. U.S.
direct investment in Africa has risen from $7 billion in 1998 to $18.5 billion
in 2006 or about 13% annually. Africa
had one of the highest annual GDP growth rates from 2000-2006 among world
regions: higher than any region other than the CIS.[11] U.S. security interests are becoming more
engaged in Africa, and cultural linkages between the United States and Africa
are growing steadily, especially with the African Diaspora. The emergence of transnational health issues
are also bringing the two continents closer together, as the ability to
control, manage and eliminate various diseases and health challenges requires
greater cooperation and collaboration between nations. New investments in
security linkages between the U.S. and African nations will require that U.S.
leadership be better educated about Africa for these linkages to be successful
for both Africa and the United States.
Not
only is there a critical role for higher education in economic development, but
we now have new tools that make linkages among higher education institutions
(within Africa and between Africa and the rest of the world) more
productive. Distance education
opportunities are now available for African students to learn from among the
best faculty in the world through a variety of distance education mechanisms.
There are also expanding opportunities for research communities to grow and
prosper across national boundaries through enhanced networks, communication
methods and computing capacities. New
communications technologies allow students and faculty in Africa to access
databases, scientific journals and expanded knowledge systems around the
world. Worldwide cell phone and video
service can connect people as never before, expanding opportunities in terms of
teaching, research and consultation.
While these are valuable tools, the messages need to be adapted and
relevant to Africa. Considerable investment is required to make U.S. and
European courses appropriate for the African context. In the African continent context where
spatial considerations are especially important, distance education can be an
effective tool for reaching farmers and people in rural areas. Africa’s experience in managing the tidal
wave of new students demanding higher education may well teach U.S. institutions
about how to make higher education more cost-effective through the use of new
technologies and techniques.
One
of the clear conclusions from we have drawn from our fact finding process is
the need to strengthen, expand and revitalize linkages between U.S. and African
institutions of higher education with the goal of strengthening the development
role of higher education and making institutions more relevant to national
needs. Such an effort should focus on
developing a program:
¨
to encourage
and support mutually beneficial collaboration between African and U.S. higher
education institutions, and
¨
to develop
mechanisms for active communication between higher education institutions
inside and outside the effort to promote the sharing of knowledge and
experiences, facilitating learning and the adoption of best practices, and
raising the visibility not only of the importance of higher education for
Africa, but also the emerging solutions arising from these partnerships.
IV. Are there potential
pitfalls to increasing aid to African colleges and universities?
Providing increased assistance to
African higher education is essential and extremely positive step. There is nothing wrong with the concept but
it must be carried out in a careful and thoughtful manner to ensure effective
and efficient use of foreign assistance resources. In the implementation of
such an effort there are some cautions described below.
Lack of African leadership in the development of
partnerships. In the past, partnerships that were less successful often
suffered from imbalance in decision-making.
This inequity in the relationship could manifest itself in all aspects
of the project. Successful development,
reform and innovation in higher education will require an intimate knowledge of
the local culture, conditions and economies of the higher education
institutions and strong African leadership in the identification of needs and
opportunities. Only if the context and
the constraints are thoroughly understood and the African partners are
collaboratively involved in making decisions about how to direct efforts will
true progress occur.
Inadequate centralized management structure to ensure
accountability and oversight. Multi-institutional projects that cross cultures and have a
diverse array of objectives present a complex management challenge. To be successful they will need strong
internal leadership and likely, external support to provide management
guidance. A well organized central
management structure for early monitoring, evaluation and guidance will improve
the success of the any effort. Communication
both within and outside the program will be essential.
Demand for wide coverage versus concentration in both
topics and institutions. In any effort to
improve the region’s higher education system on a limited funding resource,
there is tension between breadth and depth of coverage in topic focus areas and
in project funding (size versus number). There are strong pressures for
inclusion both of disciplines and institutions but wide and thin may not yield
the best overall result. For example initially focusing resources more narrowly
to develop high quality results that can be replicated may be a more effective
strategy for success.
Unified program versus collection of independent projects. The
effort to enhance higher education will likely result in a range of
projects. While the projects will have
differences determined by their institutional partners’ needs and priorities,
there is likely to be much commonality across projects. To capture the full experience at the program
level and increase that capacity at the project level, project experiences must
be shared, analyzed and adopted as appropriate between projects. In short the effort must be an integrated
shared management and learning entity not just a collection of projects.
Difficulty in selecting successful projects up front. One of the most
critical steps in developing a successful effort is to ensure the best projects
are selected. Because these types of partnership
projects are likely to be complex (many partners, disciplines, and diverse
objectives) management and leadership will be critical components of success
and the funding of planning grants will allow for strong management plans to be
established. Planning grants (small and
numerous) not only allow the potential projects the opportunity to pick good
partners and establish appropriate relationships, but also allow the oversight
entity the opportunity to judge the management skills of the projects leaders
and the efficiency of their management structure. Planning is critical to these types of
projects fully justifying investment up front to ensure quality in the end.
[1]
World Bank 2002. Constructing Knowledge Societies: New Challenges for Tertiary
Education. World Bank, Washington,
D.C.
[2] Bloom, D., Canning, D., and Chan K. (2006). Higher Education and Economic Development in
Africa. World Bank Human Development
Sector, Africa. [On-line]. Available: http://www.sciencedev.net/Docs/Higher%20Education%20and%20economic%20developmnet.pdf
[3]
http://www.arp.harvard.edu/AfricaHigherEducation/Factoids.html
[4] In
sub-Saharan African countries higher education student enrollment has increased
from 660 thousand in 1985 to over 3.4 million (over four-fold!) in 2005.
[5]
http://www.arp.harvard.edu/AfricaHigherEducation/Factoids.html
[6] In
sub-Saharan Africa, female student gross enrollment ratio remained around 2%
between 1995 and 2004, compared to 5% and above for male students. In 2004 of
the 3.4 million total tertiary education student enrollment the proportion of
female students was only 38% and the proportion of female teaching staff just
4%. In math, science and engineering, female student enrollment is particularly
low.
[7] From 1985
to 1989, 17 per cent of the World Bank’s worldwide education-sector spending
was on higher education. But from 1995 to 1999, the proportion allotted to
higher education declined to just 7 per cent.
[8] ANSTI, 2003.
[9] Africa’s share of global scientific outputs has
fallen from 0.5% in mid-1980’s to 0.3% in the mid-1990’s (http://www.idrc.ca/en/ev71249-201-1-DO_TOPICS.html
; Accessed )
[10] National Research Council of the
National Academies 2006 “The Fundamental Role of Science and Technology in
International Development: an Imperative for USAID.” National Academies Press, Washington DC,
[11]
World Trade Organization: World Trade Developments, 2007